USE THE RESOURCES BELOW IF YOU EVER NEED SOME EXTRA HELP WITH DIGITAL SAFETY

TOOLS & IMMEDIATE ACTIONS

CM-Alliance:

Browser & Social Media Privacy Guide Steps to block trackers and lock down privacy settings.

Explore the guide

SPECIALIZED & FORWARD- LOOKING RESOURCES

Frontline Defenders:

Security Kit for Activists Includes Security in-a-Box and Digital First Aid Kit.

Access the resources

Banzai:

50 Internet Safety Tips. Checklist covering Bluetooth, fraud sites, and social media.

Get the checklist

STRUCTURED LEARNING & COURSES

Coursera:

Digital Safety & Security Course. Structured, in-depth learning path.

Start learning

ALERT DESK ZW: 7 DAYS ONLINE WITH A QUEER ZIMBABWEAN

DIARY ENTRIES

6 daily entries

AVERAGE INTERNET RELIANCE (0 – 5)

48

REPORTS FILED (PLATFORM)

2 reports

What is the digital diary?

The Digital Diary is a structured method we use to
understand digital safety through lived experience. Over
7 days, a diarist documents what their online life looks
like in real time-what platforms they use, how safe those
spaces feel, what harms show up, what actions they take
to protect themselves, and how those moments spill
into offline life (like transport, school, home, rest, and
relationships).

It is designed to hold both data and feeling-because
digital harm is never only “online,” it lives in bodies and daily routines.

As you read this diary snapshot, hold one key idea
gently: a “safe” rating doesn’t always mean the absence
of harm. In the diary, safety is often something the
diarist creates through boundaries and careful choices.
So the visuals don’t just tell us what happened, they
show us the everyday labour it takes to stay connected,
stay afloat, and stay as safe as possible.

ALERT DESK ZW: 7 DAYS ONLINE WITH A QUEER ZIMBABWEAN

DIARY ENTRIES

6 daily entries

AVERAGE INTERNET RELIANCE (0-5)

4.8
REPORTS FILED (PLATFORM)
2 reports

MOST USED PLATFORMS (MINUTES)

TikTok (1 569)
32.1%
WhatsApp (1 596)
32.7%
Instagram (1 316)
26.9%
Facebook ( 405)
8.30%

PEAK RISK CONTEXTS-WHERE RISK FOLLOWED THE BODY

HOW OFTEN RISK SHOWED UP

ALERT DESK ZW: 7 DAYS ONLINE WITH A QUEER ZIMBABWEAN

DIARY ENTRIES

AVERAGE INTERNET RELIANCE (0-5)
REPORTS FILED (PLATFORM)
6 daily entries
4.8

2 reports

Most used Platforms (minutes)

Time spent clusters around WhatsApp + TikTok, with Instagram close behind. Even when platforms were rated “safe, ” the diarist still did constant background safety work (curating viewers, turning off read receipts, removing people from stories/status). That’s a key insight: “safety” here often means “managed risk,” not “absence of harm.”

Peak risk contexts: Where risk followed the body

  • Mobility is a repeated vulnerability point where harassment escalates and safety planning becomes physical.
  • “Home” is not automatically private; shared living increases the need to manage visibility and eavesdropping.
  • Learning spaces are not neutral — insults and surveillance can travel into classrooms and libraries.
  • Connectivity choices are shaped by affordability and
    infrastructure, not preference.

ALERT DESK ZW: 7 DAYS ONLINE WITH A QUEER ZIMBABWEAN

DIARY ENTRIES

6 daily entries

AVERAGE INTERNET RELIANCE (0-5)

4.8
REPORTS FILED (PLATFORM)
2 reports

Even on days where “economic impact” scored low,
emotional strain stayed high and physical risk spiked
repeatedly, especially when harm was tied to public
spaces and other people’s control over safety (transport,
school, shared housing).

Peak risk contexts: Where risk followed the body

Day Emotional strain (0-5)Physical safety risk (05)Economic impact (0-5)Social impact (0-5)Harm logged
Mon4504Hate speech/slurs; threats of violence.
Tues4305Hate speech/slurs
Wed
5503Hate speech/slur; threats; suspicious link/hacking
Thurs
5203Hate speech/slurs
Fri4324Hate speech/slurs
Sat5515Hate speech/slurs; threats; impersonation/fake profile

ALERT DESK ZW: 7 DAYS ONLINE WITH A QUEER ZIMBABWEAN

DIARY ENTRIES

AVERAGE INTERNET RELIANCE (0-5)
REPORTS FILED (PLATFORM)
6 daily entries
4.8

2 reports

Harm Patterns during the week: This is where we show the diarist’s agency and labour of staying safe.

Harm type logged Number of days it appeared (6 entries)Where it showed up
Hate speech/slurs6/6Campus/classroom/library, transit, social spaces
Threats of violence 3/6Transit + social spaces
Suspicious link/hacking attempt1/6Instagram-linked attempt via a friend
Impersonation/fake profile1/6Dating app context (Grindr)

ALERT DESK ZW: 7 DAYS ONLINE WITH A QUEER ZIMBABWEAN

DIARY ENTRIES

6 daily entries

AVERAGE INTERNET RELIANCE (0-5)

4.8

REPORTS FILED (PLATFORM)
2 reports

Hate speech/ slurs

  • Across the week, the diarist most often leaned on: blocking/reporting, tightening visibility (removing viewers; turning off read receipts), and community grounding (speaking to friends).

Hacking attempt & Fake profile

  • And at least 2 platform reports were made (Instagram + Grindr), with outcomes recorded as accounts blocked

What stands out is how safety is practiced as a daily routine ,not one dramatic “fix.” The diarist’s choices (curating who can see them, limiting read receipts, leaning on trusted friends, choosing when to leave a space/platform) show harm reduction in motion: small decisions that protect dignity, reduce exposure, and keep life moving, even while harm keeps trying to interrupt it.

ALERT DESK ZW: TRACKING LGBTQIA+ DIGITAL SECURITY

We asked 101 LGBTQIA+ people in Zimbabwe about digital safety, how safe it feels to be openly queer online and navigate the space. This index shares their platform experiences in a clear, simple way- using a score out of 5 and a safety breakdown for each platform.

How to read the scores:

  • Unsafe (1–2) | In-between (3) | Safe (4–5)

Social Media Platform Safety Ratings

ALERT DESK ZW: TRACKING LGBTQIA+ DIGITAL SECURITY

Who took part? (n = 101)

Most respondents are young LGBTQIA+ people who are active online, mainly aged 18–34.

Age snapshot (demographic %)

Gay, lesbian, bisexual, queer and transgender respondents make up
most of the sample, alongside smaller groups including asexual,
pansexual, genderfluid, GNC and MSM.

ALERT DESK ZW: TRACKING LGBTQIA+ DIGITAL SECURITY

WhatsApp

Score: 2.6 / 5

  • WhatsApp one of the leading social media platforms where people stay connected daily-through private chats and group spaces. But safety can still be broken through group dynamics, screenshots, outing, and harassment.

How safe does it feel?

No Data Found

Safety Tip:

Tighten group privacy — control who can add you and limit who can see your profile photo/status.

ALERT DESK ZW: TRACKING LGBTQIA+ DIGITAL SECURITY

Facebook

Score: 1.8/ 5

  • Facebook is highly public-facing. Posts, comments, and shares can travel beyond your chosen circle. For queer users, visibility without protection can increase exposure to hate speech, harassment, and targeting. Here, local language slurs are very common

How safe does it feel?

No Data Found

Safety Tip:

Lock down your audience, limit who can comment/message and review tags before they appear on your profile.

ALERT DESK ZW: TRACKING LGBTQIA+ DIGITAL SECURITY

Instagram

Score: 2.5/ 5

  • Instagram can feel softer, but harm still happens in comments, DMs, and when content gets reshared beyond your control. “In-between” safety still means risk is present.

How safe does it feel?

No Data Found

Safety Tip:

Use comment filters + restrict direct messages DMs from strangers.

ALERT DESK ZW: TRACKING LGBTQIA+ DIGITAL SECURITY

X(Twitter)

Score: 2.2/ 5

  • X moves fast and content can become public discourse instantly. Queer voices can find community but also face pile-ons, hate speech, and targeted harassment. Just like Facebook, local language slurs are a norm.

How safe does it feel?

No Data Found

Safety Tip:

Use mute/block tools early + limit who can reply to your posts. The option of making your account private is also available.

ALERT DESK ZW: TRACKING LGBTQIA+ DIGITAL SECURITY

Where the worst hurt happens ( summary)

Where the worst hurt happens (Severe abuse reports) WhatsApp: 38% Facebook: 23% Instagram: 13% X (Twitter): 9% TikTok: 4% Dating apps: 4% Other: 9%

Harm concentrates on everyday platforms, especially WhatsApp and Facebook. Digital violence is being normalized where queer people are most present. Safety is not an individual burden. A feminist, care centered response demands platform accountability: stronger anonymity, faster trauma-aware reporting, and moderation that protects LGBTQIA+ dignity, voice, and visibility in Zimbabwe.